![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-xCjNk7sRYHPA2mUyGQOqUiTNcpu3J_G3CbA5HanSSrECaQqWEOseWQvObBQaTzGw23On9WqgH8OypvQkNx6HMixMTQKzGXm7RIDfu5IJiIrFM3-bIulwiYoYz_bjlfHbnnqcrZdyPp5j/s1600/objectives.jpg)
Tuesday's class was very thought provoking due to its discussion of objectives. Specifically, Dr. Rob said it is very important for Instructional Designers and IDDE students to understanding and know how to write effective learner-oriented objectives. I am in complete agreement with this opinion; however, in conversation with Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) in other academic disciplines, I was told that learning objectives are considered a form of spoon feeding information to students and is frowned upon. This opinion is seemingly prevalent among scholars in academic disciplines outside of Education and IDDE. The challenge and goal for an instructional designer is demonstrating to SMEs that the use of learner-centered objectives are beneficial to both students and instructors.
Dr. Rob explained that objectives are useful on multiple levels:
Students | Instructors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaRGWsOQDetu0WeoKrYMgX5IxzfoSIJc9Xt1FKXa8PirxNIiSUDQBNdBNxesu0xaXMgHHRyLQXv5VJzeco0HwAt5kIbb4uaVdrfRd1nMOoojcAWn-Y1WQY5y-BvGcz_6sgRoMGyWaHdRpt/s1600/final+thoughts_2.jpg)
Emerging Trend
Increasingly, some researchers consider learning objectives ineffectual and obsolete. Thus, they are calling for a change in the taxonomies (Table 1) associated with learning objectives (Gander, 2006). A taxonomy of proficiency (Table 2) is suggested as a needed measure for determining learner "competency" and "continuing development" in relation to both academic performance and work-related performance (p. 12). With the growing socio-cultural and political connections between countries, due to globalization and technological advancements, Americans need to be proficient in broader areas and have a high level of skill-sets. Proficiency assessment is viewed as a needed measurement tool for 21st century growth and development needs.
- "Shows measurable growth over time
- Integrates complex skills into a whole
- Shows change as improvements in handling variables, while maintaining standards rather than mere completion" (p. 15).
In my opinion, I do not think learning objective are ineffectual or obsolete. They are very useful in guiding student in their academic studies.In terms of proficiencies assessment, this may be a useful tool for when student are engaged in project- or problem-based learning activities. The real world element of such type of learning activities, lend itself to the type of authentic assessment Gander and other scholars are call for in the field of taxonomy studies.
__________________________________________
Reference
Gander, S. L. (2006, March). Throw out learning objectives! In support of new taxonomy. Performance Improvement, 45(3), 9-15. doi: 10.1002/pfi.2006.4930450304.
Images
(2012). Objectives. [Web Graphics]. Retrieved from http://thecampuscareercoach.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/career-objective-resume.jpg
(n.d.). Random thoughts. [Web Graphics]. Retrieved from http://www.internetmonk.com/wp-content/uploads/random-thoughts.jpg
heya Aja,
ReplyDeleteThat table showing how objectives can be useful for teachers vs students is really great. It does a wonderful job of summing it up! Thank you for sharing that.
:-)
rob
Hi Rob:
DeleteNo problem. Tuesday was a great class session. I enjoyed learning about objective construction. I firmly believe that all instructors, regardless of their academic discipline should include learning objectives on their course syllabus. Learning objectives help student to know what are the expected learning outcomes for a course. Moreover, that can help as a study guide who are proficient in self-directed learning strategies.
~Aja
Hi, Aja,
ReplyDeleteYour blog surprises me again! :D I really like your critical thinking about learning objectives and the taxonomy of proficiency. You said that you were told a prevalent idea that "learning objectives are considered a form of spoon feeding information to students and is frowned upon". This reminds me of the comparison between the teacher-centered instructions and the student-centered instructions. I think that objective itself is definitely good in instructions. Yet, the problem is that in the process of implement instructors could apply learning objectives as their measures to control and push students. That will put a lot of pressure on students and constrain their abilities. For instance, in China K-12 schools, some teachers would provide students who get high scores in exams best seats in the classroom. Thus many students feel nervous about exams, because they do not want to sit in a place far away from the teacher. The uncomfortable feelings will influence students' study efficiency.
And your taxonomy of proficiency basically shows us the various degrees of objectives. In instruction, a lot of designers may stop in a specific level (I saw a lot of instructions stop at "Independent") and ignore the possibility of further improvement. So the taxonomy is an excellent way to tell us that the development of objectives is also important.
Best,
Yang
Hi Yang:
DeleteThank you for your posting. I enjoyed reading your comments. I must admit that I strongly disagree with the SME in terms of her viewpoint about learning objectives. I do not believe that objectives are a form of spoon feeding students. Instead, I perceive them as needed guidelines for students to know what are the learning outcomes for a particular course. I think it would be in the best interest of all SME to have good learning objectives listed on their syllabus. Learning objectives that are in alignment with formative and summative assessments as well as designated learning activities can increase student understanding and overall course satisfaction.
Lastly, I do not think taxonomy of proficiency should replace Bloom's taxonomy and other taxonomies. Instead, I can see them as an additive form of assessment.
~Aja